Where assessee settles TDS liability as a deductor of TDS under Vivad se Vishwas (i.e against order u/s 201), when will he get consequential relief of expenditure allowance under proviso to section 40(a)(i)/(ia)?

In such cases, the deductor shall be entitled to get consequential relief of allowable expenditure under proviso to section 40(a)(i)/(ia) in the year in which the tax was required to be deducted. To illustrate, let us assume that there are two appeals pending; one against the order under section 201 of the Act for non-deduction of TDS and another one against the order under section 143 (3) of the Act for disallowance under section 40(a)(i)/(ia) of the Act. The disallowance under section 40 is with respect to some issues on which order under section 201 has been issued. If the dispute is settled with respect to order under section 20 I, the assessee will not be required to pay any tax on the issue relating to disallowance under section 40(a)(i)/(ia) of the Act, in accordance with the provision of section 40(a)(i)/(ia) of the Act. In case, in the order under section 143(3), there are other issues as well, and the appellant wants to settle the dispute with respect to order under section 143(3) as well, then the disallowance under section 40(a)(i)/(ia) of the Act relating to the issue on which he has already settled liability under section 201 would be ignored for calculating disputed tax. If the assessee has challenged the order under section 20 I on merits and has won in the Supreme Court or the order of any appellate authority below Supreme Court on this issue in favor of the assessee has not been challenged by the Department on merit (not because the appeal was not filed on account of monetary limit for filing of appeal as per applicable CEDT circular), then in a case where disallowance under section 40(a)(i)/(ia) of the Act is in consequence of such order under section 20 I and is part of the disputed income as per order under section 143(3) in his case, such disallowance would be ignored for calculating disputed tax, in accordance with the proviso to section 40(a)(i)/(ia) of the Act. It is clarified that if the assessee has made payment against the addition representing section 40(a)(i)/(ia) disallowance, the assessee shall not be entitled to interest under section 244A of the Act on amount refundable, if any, under Vivad se Vis/lWas, It is further clarified that if the assessee wishes to settle disallowance under section 40(a)(i)/(ia) in a search case on the basis of settlement of the dispute under section 201, he shall be required to pay a higher amount as applicable for search cases for settling the dispute in respect of that TDS default under section 201.